‘RHOBH’ Dorit Kemsley Believes Lisa Rinna and Eileen Davidson ‘Team Up and Go After’ People

Posted on Jan 17 2017 - 12:35am by Terri L. Austin

Dorit Kemsley may be new to The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills, but she’s learning how the game is played — and I’m not talking about charades. I’m talking about the minefield of reality TV.

In her blog this week, Dorit stated once and for all (God, I hope this is the end of it) that she never meant to hurt Erika Girardi, and all the women knew about her “cheeky” gift and not one of them dissuaded her.

“For the record, I never wanted to hurt or shame Erika in any way. …no one discouraged me from getting them or even gave Erika the heads up — and these are her friends — so I honestly thought she would find it funny.”

But not only does Eileen Davidson keep bringing up the panty situation, she also wants to know all the intricate details of what was discussed at Dorit’s dinner party. And Lisa Rinna has been right there with her, rehashing old shit and trying to serve it up like it’s fresh.

Eileen and Lisa R., these two are the closest of friends — they share every little thing together. Not sure why Lisa R. and Eileen need to keep making something out of this dinner conversation… It was a few comments with friends over dinner, that’s all ladies. Please, this doesn’t need to continue…”

Poor, naïve Dorit. Of course it will continue. This Eileen we’re talking about!

While game night was a fun distraction, Eileen picked up where she left off — Erika’s panties! Under the guise of concern for Erika, she roped Dorit into yet another confrontation.

“…quite honestly having heard Eileen rehash “pantygate” ONCE AGAIN felt more than I could bear. Erika continues to reassure me that it’s behind us, but Eileen can’t seem to allow that. It doesn’t feel like a “friend” sticking up for a “friend” at this point. It feels more like an attack.”

Although Dorit is learning the reality rules, she needs to learn to shut Eileen down fast and hard, or this pantygate talk will never end. And I mean never.

“…I’ve now learned in just a few weeks that when things get brought up again and again, it doesn’t end well, so why on earth are we continuing to repeat the same things and discuss something that Erika has said time and time again was over?”

When Kim Richards agreed with Dorit, that Eileen and Rinna get each other worked up into a frothy whipped smoothie of anger and paranoia, she felt vindicated.

“Then when Kim started talking about Lisa R. and Eileen’s relationship…it was precisely what I was explaining to the girls at the table. …Eileen and Lisa R. really look out for each other and how they could team up and go after someone. I can appreciate a close friendship, but it’s starting to feel like one winds the other one up.”

Dorit isn’t going to take their crap, and if they come after her, she’s going to fight back every time.

“I, for one, will always stick up for myself and not allow people to bully me or drag things out to make more of a situation then it has to be. Even if it feels like four against one, I have to know I did my best to defend myself, particularly when I NEVER had any mal intent.”

So, can we forget this unfortunate incident ever happened? Can we erase from our memories the past three or four episodes? Probably not, because Eileen is still a cast member, and girl likes to beat that poor, deceased horse.

So, do you think Dorit has a point about Eileen and Rinna? And what about Kyle, washing her hands of the panty gift? Why didn’t she discourage Dorit if she thought Erika would be “blindsided”?

 

“Like” us on Facebook  “Follow” us on Twitter and on Instagram 

About the Author

I'm a fiction writer by day and a reality TV addict by night. Stay in touch with Terri: Facebook | Website | Twitter     >>>>Check out books authored by Terri L. Austin: Beauty and the Brit series -- His Every Need, To Be His, His Kind of Trouble    >>>> The Rose Strickland Mystery series -- Diners, Dives and Dead Ends, Last Diner Standing, Diner Impossible, Diner Knock Out,   Heartache Motel     

  • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

    Well it was only a matter of time when Dorito’s true modus operandi was revealed … she was clearly brought on as a “Pinkie” to do battle for Li$a. We knew Li$a wasn’t quite through yet with Rinna and Eileen. As Kyle said, Li$a NEVER forgets.

    • italiano bambino

      Lisa VP doesn’t like to get her hands dirty.

      • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

        Hehehe … sounds so deliciously devious when you put it like that.

        • HankyPanky

          How come you’re still up? I’ve got an excuse….,

          • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

            My usual bedtime is around 3 to 3:30-ish (CST). It’s a terrible habit that I really need to break. Then, only with the help of a Benadryl or Xanax will I get maybe 5 hrs. of interrupted sleep due to sleep apnea.

          • Contessa Bel Raven

            Have you been assessed for a cpap yet? The difference e in sleep is wonderful. I even use mine for naps. Now it’s not the apnea waking up, just the pain 😕

          • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

            I lost my subsidy for insurance and the thieving A-holes are offering me a $600 a month premium which I can’t afford (at least for now). I had to cancel my pulmonary specialist appt (required for the CPAP) and also my first annual EchoCardiogram to see how my ailing ♥ is doing. Long story short … I’m EFFED:-( Hopefully the new administration will get something into place ASAP (because I can’t wait). I’m being told this sleep disorder could be literally killing me.

          • Contessa Bel Raven

            So sorry to hear that. I hope it gets straightened out quickly and in your favour. It’s stories like yours and other friends in the US that make me thankful for our (although flawed but still a benefit) healthcare system. Yes, Sleep Apnea is hard on a healthy body as it is not getting the proper rest nor the oxygen it needs. When you through other health issues into the mix it makes them worse.

          • HankyPanky

            Jeeze, sorry about that, sleep apnea is bad. Only good thing is we get to “play” whilst everyone else is sleeping. My excuse is… I’m a long, long way from where you are… 😘

          • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

            Yes aren’t you in England love?

          • HankyPanky

            Was Originally, now I’m embracing “Men at Work” 😉

          • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

            Oh wow … how awesome:-) Definitely on my bucket list.

          • HankyPanky

            Come on down Darls

          • HankyPanky

            Hahaha, meant in the travelling mode, didn’t mean to offend!!

      • HankyPanky

        Doesn’t need to, Eileen & Rinna are sinking in their own dirt

    • HankyPanky

      Neither do I, forget that Scum & Scumber tried taking down LVP, epic fail. Whatever Doritos mission I’m just glad she’s slapping down the gruesome Twosome…

      • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

        But you’re forgetting that Li$a came for THEM, so saying they tried to take HER down just doesn’t add up.

        • HankyPanky

          Hahaha, they went for themselves, same as now. LVP may have “played” with them to reveal their personalities, mistake, they don’t have personalities apart from Biatch & handler. What doesn’t add up is how these two are still on the show.

          • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

            HP, you’re incorrigible:-)

          • HankyPanky

            Youse too X

        • Kissme

          How did LVP go for them? Please don’t use the word affair because that was stupid.

          • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

            Darlin’ I would love to rehash last season, but I just don’t have the energy. I’ll just say this; Li$a was a shady passive/aggressive coont last season, and I’m sticking to it. Where we differ is , apparently many fans find this behavior as justified and/or even an endearing part of her personality.

          • Kissme

            Darlin’ 😜 I don’t want to rehash either. We all see things differently but yes all the housewives are shady, passive/ aggressive, we can definitely agree on that.

          • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

            Oh contrare’ HoneyPieSweetThang, I can’t agree to that at all.

          • Kissme

            I was just having a bit of fun, have a great day!

          • AnEnigmaWrappedIn$nark

            You too sweet Kisses:-)

    • jb44

      Actually, it is Eileen who never forgets and never lets go. She then gets her sidekick to help her in her never ending rehashing and bashing.

  • italiano bambino

    Oh dorit clearly miss LVP forward you all the 411 in regards eileen and Lisa Rinas drama from last season. Was confirm in that dinner table with dorit pk and lisa Rina discussing all the deaths of Davidson and Rina. Lisa V P is truly a snipper from the side.

    • 4peace

      Well, I am sure Dorit watched the show same as we. Plain to see, Soapy and Sudsy are conniving bores with zero story unless it involves dragging a cast mate.

      • italiano bambino

        She’s traveling the world she got no time to watch no Housewives.

    • Rinna brought up the deaths and fights of last season. Not PK or Dorit. Plus all of them have friends or alliances on these shows. Yolanda had Erika who came in hating LVP. Rinna has Elieen ….so its no different if Lisa has Dorit to back her. Having friends who have you back does not make you a sniper. Lisa has not once pretended she thinks of Elieen or Rinna as friends at this point and has been open about her disdain for them after last season. Plus I don’t believe any of the new housewives who claimed they have “never” watched the shows they were joining. Can you imagine going through the process of getting hired and knowing you are about to be on a nationally syndicated TV show and NOT watching it to see what you are getting yourself into? Oh please like they have something more important to do with their lives!

  • WeCouldBeHeroes

    Oh STFU Doritos. No one gives a shit about you

    • Lol, so true!

  • wellWellwell

    Dorit is absolutely correct, it is an attack. Eileen and Rinna need SL’s they have none of their own that’s interesting enough for the show. I think Rinna is Eileen’s wind up toy. Eileen say’s just enough to wind up Rinna and lets her go because she knows Rinna is bat sh*t crazy.
    Giving both of them a SL..eye-roll, such bad actors
    Kyle is a coward she will never admit her role in anything, it could hurt Mogreasy’s business.
    He has scolded her on camera so she throws rocks and hides.

    • HankyPanky

      I agree, & Kyle slip slides away as usual

    • Evil Queen

      Morgreasy’s. 😁😁😁

    • Yveline

      Thank you. Someone else is watching the same show as I am. I thought based on some views, I must have imagined the soap actresses creating their storylines on the screen as we watched.

  • HankyPanky

    Spot on Dorit, forewarned, I think not, but who cares, doesn’t make a difference. Eileen & Rinna are so obviously transparent they would be laughable if they weren’t so nasty & so terribly thirsty.

  • Sugar in my tank

    So am I to understand that Doritos is the victim now? Puhleeze, someone has to tell this 40 year old woman that it was not funny or appropriate to give another woman whom she barely knows in front of cameras a pair of panties. Seriously? It was her intention, from the gate to embarrass Erika so Doritos needs to accept the role she played in this bull sh*t was and move on. Doritos is angry at everyone except the perve (PK) who was scooching down to look at Erika’s puss once she said she didn’t have on panties and brag he enjoyed the view to his wife. Perhaps this is why Doritos was so messy about this. She even attempted to implicate Kyle into her decision to buy the panties while being an insecure, passive aggressive wife of a pig of a husband. If Doritos felt ganged up on, why didn’t her friend LVP come to the rescue? Is she resenting Rinna’s and Eileen’s friendship while no one supported that “cunty” move to buy a b*tch a pair of panties? See, don’t start something that you cannot finish and then play victim when the sh*t hits the fan. Doritos is playing off the fact that Rinna and Eileen aren’t fan favorites..Doritos will meet the same fate as the other fly by night one season Housewives with no storyline unless she is kept around for cameos from Boy George.

    • italiano bambino

      Bloop bloop

    • Yveline

      All Erica had to do is wear panties and not flash someone else’s husband and there would not have been an issue. No one taught her to sit without flashing her privates, that is basic home training. Imagine if she had flashed Harry Hamlin, Eileen’s husband or worse Mauricio. The sky would be falling. Stop blaming the woman whose husband was flashed and blame the person with no home training!!!
      Everything else is a deflection,

      • Sugar in my tank

        No see this is where people are missing the point. No woman have to wear panties or bras because that is their choice. I believe that she said that she didn’t know that she flashed him and why didn’t he say something to her as a man, as opposed to gawk. He looked hard because he wanted to see and as he told his wife”he enjoyed the view”. What I find appalling is no one blames the husband for disrespecting his wife but admonishes Erika for doing what millions of women occasionally do, not wear panties.. From what I saw, the pervert was trying to catch a glance and he did but you use home training as an excuse to judge someone for their attire. First, you must believe she intentionally flashed the pervert, which I do not. Then as you mention blame the wife, no I blame the wife for deflection from dealing with her husband’s overt disrespect of her..Go right ahead and defend a woman who purchased a pair of panties for another woman because her husband downright gazed at this woman’s vagina, right in front of her. This marriage will not last 7 years and I am being gracious and not because of this but if he can do something like this and throw it in her face, I can only imagine what’s coming next…

        • Yveline

          You are right, I am judging her. If this were any of the other women, I would not because their prior behavior does not warrant it. Erica, however, parades herself on stage barely covered and chooses to act offended when someone looks when she flashes them. At some point, we have to take responsibility for the circumstances we create. If she had dressed properly, sat properly, not flashed him, this would not be a story line. Those of you who like can make excuses for her, but if this were LVP, Brandi or Vicky all of you would be saying what I am saying.

          Somehow, on a thread relating to Lisa Rinna and Eileen teaming to attack people which we have seen ad nauseam, it still turns into an attack on LVP and Dorit. Go figure…

          • Sugar in my tank

            Actually that’s not true for me because I try to be impartial for all cast whether I like their characters or not.. I like LVP and Vicky but when they are wrong, I call them on it. As for Erika, I heard her say, she didn’t know she flashed him so she was embarrassed by that and wished he had said something. What’s interesting is that she did not have much of anything to say about this entire foolish ass storyline which has been Doritos every single episode. Viewers don’t like her so she is being dragged for not wearing panties while PK is being championed for being a man, which is so very sad..

          • Yveline

            Read some of your other postings, you’re not that impartial. If a man flashed me, i would probably look as well and still be offended. It would not excuse him for the flashing.

          • Sugar in my tank

            As I said, I try to be as impartial as I can but when my favorites are wrong, they are wrong. I don’t hold everything against them forever. My perspective is just that, mine and sometimes one can view it with partiality if it goes against their favorite. See Erika is not a regular favorite of mine but people are judging her attire because she is not uptight and is comfortable in her skin, while they’re not comfortable in theirs. If I had on a pair of my white pants and my zipper was down unbeknownst to me and I do not wear undies with white and people stared and said nothing, that’s not my fault. I did nothing wrong and I owe an apology to no one for staring and saying nothing. I would imagine women may look and hopefully a classy person would tell me that my mailbox was open and mail was on display.

          • the underground train

            Lol. Love the mailbox metaphor.

          • Yveline

            love your example of pants with open zipper. that is not purposeful, that would be an accident. She was wearing a short skirt, not the same thing. Mailbox comparison is not the same as I would hear the mail falling. Maybe I just hold people to a certain standard, if you are offended by people staring, don’t flash them. I am done with this.

          • Sugar in my tank

            Interesting to hold strangers on edited television to a standard but agree to disagree. I was over the panties last month. Thanks for the comment..

      • bluebell

        So true, I’m with you 100%.

    • the underground train

      I agree except that she is right to call out Lisa Rinna and Eileen for egging her on at first and then back tracking. Whether they are fan favorites or not they needed to be called out too.

      • Trippinhhard

        Thank you that’s all Evileen and Lisa doesis backtrack beause they have no storyline, so they make up one as the show goes on….

      • Sugar in my tank

        I see your point but she ultimately as an adult made the decision and wants to blame someone for encouraging her as if she was a child. She tried the same thing with the panties with Kyle. I just want her to own her sh*t. She is not in junior high school.

        • the underground train

          I agree with taking responsibility for your actions. But on the flip side it is grating to be admonished by the person who encouraged you. If it was Erika herself airing out her grievances then I would have nothing to say. But to hear and see Eileen on her sanctimonious high horse made me want to puke almost. I don’t think I ever rolled my eyes so hard. Eileen tried to call out Dorit and put her in time out when Eileen knew what Dorit was up to. She didn’t tell her that may not be a good idea. Instead she laughed. Now after Erika has said the situation was embarrassing and she wants to put it behind her. Eileen brings up the subject again. In front of other people who were not even involved in it in the first place (Eden, Camille and Kim).

          • Sugar in my tank

            Okay now we know how these shows go..they supposed to address these issues at their manufactured parties. I hear you but these women are all actresses except Erika and maybe one other. Production also drives these parties too so I am not surprised at the dynamics. The only thing I disagree with you on is Eileen having to tell this adult what she’s doing was a bad idea. I just think that Doritos was being messy and insecure and wanted to humiliate Erika. Would I give someone deodorant or soap if they smell or a wig if their hair is jacked? No to both. Doritos is an American woman from Connecticut by way of New York so she knows better.

          • the underground train

            Yes these situations are manufactured. No argument there. Also please understand that I am not saying Eileen HAS to tell Dorit what she was doing was a bad idea. What I am saying is that Eileen was acting like a cheerleader to Dorit’s plan at first. When it backfired Eileen is smacking Dorit’s hand and saying bad girl. I liken it to giving a pyromaniac matches and fuel and saying have fun. Then turning around and yelling at them for starting a fire. Whether Erika is an actress or not it should have been her to address any concerns about panty gate with Dorit not Eileen. How does Eileen get a pass on cheering on Dorit then not be called out on hypocrisy for admonishing the same behavior she cheered on earlier?

          • Sugar in my tank

            You are correct, Eileen said she would like to see that as I would to, jokingly because I would never have thought that crazy b*tch would have bought someone some f*ckin panties and present it to her on camera. That’s some ballsy sh*t meant to embarrass her for how her husband made her feel, IMO..I just don’t see how it’s Eileen’s fault. Sorry but the gall of her doing that sh*t and not being angry at that pudgy husband boils my blood and I know this sh*t is tv..

          • the underground train

            Mine too. PK looks gross to me. And personally I hope that Dorit let him have it but it just took place off camera. I am not blaming Eileen or Kyle for Dorit’s actions. I am just simply stating that to me they look bad when they play cheerleader and then do a 180 and play admonisher. Is that a word? I think I just made that up. Anywhoo you get what I am saying? Btw, I have given a comb or brush to someone whose hair was messed up, lol.

          • Sugar in my tank

            Me too and yes I understand

          • bluebell

            ITA 100%!

          • bluebell

            2 bad Dorit didn’t bring up the fact that ED wanted to be there & not 1 of the ladies told her not to do it It was a joke.

        • Wishmich

          NO!! Don’t OWN anything! Anybody! Can’t take the owning the shit stuff with this group anymore. It’s not a big deal, but they are making it a big deal. Let’s find a FUN story line.

          • Sugar in my tank

            They definitely need a new storyline because the panties need to be retired..

        • Maria

          I don’t think that is the case. I believe that Kyle, Whileen and LR now acting all offended for EG is what is probably frustrating for her. Not only were they all inon it, asked to be there when it happened and mocked EG for her exposure. They all looked gleefully on when Dorit presented them to her. They all looked disappointed when EG initially laughed it off. I think things changed when EG found out that everyone was in on it, mocked her about it and PKs Percy ways. That’s when the tide turned and these witches felt bad and now are going after Dorit for something they encouraged.

          • Sugar in my tank

            I just want this contrived storyline to END..

          • bluebell

            I agree 100%. It was a joke & nnt 1 of them told Dorit not to do it. They even wanted to be there.

      • bluebell

        Agree

  • Evil Queen

    Kyle’s comment about Erika being ,” blindsided,” is a common statement anyone would deduce from that situation.
    Dorit, you screwed up. You gave an acquaintance a pair of panties,& thought it was” Cheeky” fun. Dorit, u talked too everyone about it, except for Erika. You rubbed your hands together, ( like a villain), while discussing it with Rinna,& Eileen.
    So, Dorit put on your big girl panties & deal with your ” Faux pas.”

    • Now you know Kyle has been doing white parties and attending them since season 1 so what are the chances she wore the wrong panties by accident? Then to call your friend to borrow underwear (ewwwww) like that is even a remote possibility? NO. Production and film crew must know Erika went sans underwear often and must have told Kyle to make that call and make it an issue. Possible when Dorit said to Kyle “you were in it from the start” at game night when she was a little tipsy she was telling the truth about their little set up of the storyline. Kyle often annoys me because she sets up people to do a certain SL like the munchausen crap and point her finger at LVP. Even Rinna has admitted she first discussed that topic with Kyle and a Producer over dinner when deciding to bring it up. At least LVP doesn’t go around accusing her of planning the SL along with her! Now I am not even sure if PK saw anything, only other person to corroborate they saw anything is Kyle at that trip where she shopped with Dorit to pick the underwear so it may be possible that this is a SL and Dorit is the poor soul who didn’t see how wrong it was about to go for her. I am starting to get insulted at all the fake storylines on all of the Bravo reality shows now days.

      • HankyPanky

        I think so too

    • HankyPanky

      You’re right, Dorit spoke to everyone, apart from Erika & Lvp. Eileen, Rinna & Kyle, all agreed to the cheeky fun, then back peddlalled.

  • Sunflower

    Erika taking pride in telling everyone who wants to listen… that she is not wearing panties, without blinking an eye at 45 years old….
    makes me want to buy her a dozen bloomers with flowers, animals and all the pastel colors of a non-rainbow.
    Dorit was classy to buy her some cute lace panties; I thought they looked 2 sizes too small.

  • Trippinhhard

    They do tag team everyone, because their lives are boring.. Evileen is going to talk about Vince the gambler and Lisa is going to talk about Harry the rambler and hertwo narcissistic daughters, and theybdot looklike model material. Models these days can be anystar offspring, there’s no longer aheight requirement or looks, exotic, different or anything..

  • Jennymckitty

    Dorit got it right. Eileen will continue to “clear the air” over and over until something small turns into an insurmountable wall and Rinna will be right by her side spewing her outrage.

  • Oh Snarky Me

    Dorit played a little joke–it was no big deal and Eileen knew about it before hand. If there was an issue, why didn’t she tell Dorit? I know why, so she could cause a big stink about it later. Shut up Eileen.

    • bluebell

      Exactly!

  • bluebell

    Love Dorit. Can’t stand ED, LR, EG, or Eden.

  • bluebell

    Spot on Dorit ( & Kim). ED & LR do gang up & stir up!